Syndicate
|
Stay up to date with the Cosmic Fantasia RSS feed
|
|
|
South Asia: Report on Media Freedom Under Flak |
|
|
|
|
Written by Kalinga Seneviratne
|
|
Tuesday, 08 May 2007 |
(IPS) - A report on press freedom in South Asia produced by
the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has been criticised by
media experts following its launch in this far-flung Indian Ocean island
country that itself scores badly on issue.
The report, titled 'The Fight Goes On', was officially released here on
Wednesday during a two-day seminar organised by the Asian Media
Information and Communication Centre (AMIC) in association with UNESCO and
the Maldives government.
In a forward to the report, IFJ director for Asia-Pacific Jacqueline Park
describes South Asia as one of the most dangerous places for journalists
to work in the world. "Those who threaten them (the journalists) are too
often protected from prosecution by a culture of immunity and
indifference," she says In a forward to the report, IFJ director for Asia-Pacific Jacqueline Park
describes South Asia as one of the most dangerous places for journalists
to work in the world. "Those who threaten them (the journalists) are too
often protected from prosecution by a culture of immunity and
indifference," she says.
The IFJ report documents murder and harassment of journalists in almost
all countries in South Asia, with Bangladesh having the worst record with
at least 462 journalists reported attacked or harassed in 238 separate
incidents. Nepal is the only bright spot where press freedom has improved
since the signing of the peace accord between the government and the
Maoist communists in November last year. In Pakistan, the report said,
government officials, the police and military intelligence were often
behind "systematic and frequently brutal, attacks on journalists."
"There is a tendency throughout this report to focus only on tragic,
negative consequences of the exercise of freedom," noted Javed Jabbar, a
former Pakistan information minister. "There is no adequate
acknowledgement of the enormous growth in freedom of expression in the
media (in Pakistan) by which most people who use that freedom are not
subjected to persecution or harassment," he told IPS.
"To see it in only one perspective is to deny the readers of this report
that essential requirement of fairness and balance," added Jabbar.
Kanak Dixit, publisher of Nepal's Himal magazine, agrees with IFJ's
assessment that press freedom has improved in the Himalayan country since
the signing of the peace accord last year. "Media is now free, but its
challenges have become much more complex," he said in an interview.
"Grassroots democracy requires grassroots journalism in the language of
the mass public," argues Dixit. "Nepal was able to bring change because
the Nepal media is primarily in the Nepali language. Thus, we can take
information to the masses at the grassroots in their own language so that
they could fight for their freedoms." "Grassroots democracy requires grassroots journalism in the language of
the mass public," argues Dixit. "Nepal was able to bring change because
the Nepal media is primarily in the Nepali language. Thus, we can take
information to the masses at the grassroots in their own language so that
they could fight for their freedoms."
This is a point endorsed by one of India's well-known investigative
journalists Aniruddha Bahal. "There is a need to address threats faced by
local journalists in small towns and provinces," he told IPS. "There is
this tendency by district level administrations who are all powerful to
intimidate journalists. That intimidation rarely filters to the national
media nor is it reported upon."
The IFJ report did point out a number of attacks on journalists in
districts, especially in the conflict-prone Indian states such as Kashmir,
Assam and Manipur.
The report is scathing on Sri Lanka's press freedom record in the past
year, saying it "has severely worsened." IFJ says that Tamil journalists
in particular have been targets of murder, kidnapping and harassment; and
the president and a number of government leaders have labelled journalists
who are critical of government policy as traitors to the country working
in collusion with the Tamil separatist group Liberation Tigers of Tamil
Eelam (LTTE).
Sugeeswara Senadhira, media advisor to the government of Sri Lanka, after
reading the report told IPS that the biggest violator of press freedom in
Sri Lanka is the LTTE and there is only a passing reference to it in the
IFJ report. He explained that the LTTE does not allow any Tamil newspaper
to function in the areas it controls in the north and the east of the
country. Even the three Tamil newspapers published in Colombo are not
allowed to be distributed in their areas without subjecting to censorship.
"Every day LTTE cadres check the contents of the newspapers at their
checkpoint before allowing it to pass through. So suppression of the media
is in LTTE areas," he argues.
Senadhira also added that the report has exaggerated comments made by the
environment minister Champika Ranawaka of the Buddhist nationalist Jatika
Hela Urumaya party. "He has been misquoted and he has not made any death
threats at all," he noted, adding that the said comments were made three
months before he became a minister, not after, as indicated in the report.
For foreign participants at the Male event, a reality check was offered by
the public confrontation between a small group of local journalists and
the young, articulate Information Minister of the Maldives Mohamed Nasheed
after he expatiated on media reform moves in the Malidves .
Though the IFJ report, which was written by one of the dissident
journalists present there, claimed that Maldives press freedom record was
dismal with constant harassment of journalists, the minister said he had
six bills in parliament designed to liberalise the media environment in
this archipelago of 300,000 people.
"What has changed today is the media policy of the government,'' said
Nasheed. "People should not expect us to achieve in one year, what took
many countries 100 years to achieve.''
When one of the local journalists told the minister that he should take
steps to stop police harassment of journalists on the beat, the minister
fired back saying that the problem is with what he called "multi-task
journalists" -- that is activists who masquerade as journalists.
"We have offered to have an accreditation scheme for journalists so that
they could be protected but you people refused to accept it," he told the
accuser. "How can we identify activists from journalists without an
accreditation scheme?" asked the minister.
Source: IPS - Inter Press Service News Agency
|
|
Featured Screensaver Our Leonardo da Vinci screensaver celebrates the genius of the man and displays 54 of his greatest artworks (some with different versions), drawing scientific studies and drawings. Download Screensaver
More Screensavers
|